Saturday, 28 May 2016

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)



What is it? It's a form of talking therapy that can help you manage your problems by changing the way you think and behave. It focuses on how your thoughts, beliefs and attitudes affect your feelings and behaviour, and teaches you coping skills for dealing with different problems. It combines cognitive therapy (examining the things you think) and behaviour therapy (examining the things you do).

Does it work? CBT cannot cure your physical symptoms, it can only help you cope better with  them. It may reduce the level of disability you experience because of the pain without reducing the pain or it may just improve your mood. Studies suggest its impact is only likely to be small to moderate, but reliably better than no treatment at all.

Who does it work for? Because it's about changing your thinking and behaviour, not treating your pain directly, it can work for people with any type of pain. However, its results will vary from person to person, and given that some reviews of trials conclude it works best on mood, it may work best for people who experience low moods because of their pain.

Who doesn't it work for? Not everyone who tries CBT benefits. I wasn't able to find evidence which predicted in advance which people were more or less likely to benefit from it, although if you already have a positive mood most of the time and/or have already optimised your thinking, behaviour and coping strategies, you may not get additional benefit. The question here is whether you have genuinely already optimised your strategies, or whether CBT ideas and exercises could give you additional help.

Where can I get it? Clinics of pain education (COPEs) tend to offer it as part of their services. In theory you could be referred for CBT directly by your GP, but given the current financial constraints on the NHS, some or all GPs may be unwilling to refer patients directly for NHS treatment, although they may be able to recommend a CBT therapist for you to see privately. Alternatively, a register of all the accredited CBT therapists in the UK is available here. It is worth checking if the therapist you are thinking about seeing knows about using CBT to treat chronic pain, as treatment of pain is not the commonest use of CBT and it's possible that pain treatment differs either slightly or a lot from treatment of other problems. According to Wikipedia, you can also get CBT in group sessions or in computerised form (e.g. an app) or by reading self-help materials.

How much does it cost? If you can get it on the NHS it is free. If you have to pay to see a therapist privately, according to the NHS website the cost is usually between £40 and £100 per session, sessions are generally 30-60 minutes. WebMD says you will probably need between 8 and 24 sessions plus possibly booster sessions for chronic pain.

Is there a cheap/free version? You can buy a book on CBT and apply the techniques from there. I haven't tried any books, but Overcoming Chronic Pain:A Self-Help Guide Using Cognitive Behavioural Techniques gets 4 stars on Amazon and only costs £7.49 on Kindle, from £2.99 used or from £7.11 new. If this book includes exercises, it may help to get a friend or family member involved to encourage you to complete all the exercises, for instance checking up on whether you have done the exercises, as it is all to easy to simply stop reading a book or skip the exercises.
Alternatively you can get free CBT apps for your phone. Look up CBT in the Google Play Store or iTunes. Most of these are aimed at depression or anxiety and none at pain, but some seem to be more general CBT information, and in fact some of these techniques are likely to also apply to chronic pain anyhow. Also, if your pain is causing you depression or anxiety, then these apps are particularly appropriate.
I've briefly tried Cognitive Styles CBT Test, which tests your tendency to think in a way that CBT thinks will be to your benefit or detriment. Despite passing most of the test with flying colours and getting roundly praised, I found its assumptions about what some of my answers meant irritating. On the other hand, I have quite a long history of finding this sort of thing irritating, so I suspect I'm not the ideal target, and if you're less irritable than me it may give you some useful areas to think about. I also tried CBT Thought Record Diary. I liked this a lot better, and filled in my first diary entry about my irritation with the previous app. I found this helpful (it actually dissipated my irritation), but I have existing knowledge of CBT thinking styles and errors due to my reading and listening interests. I think you need this knowledge to use the app well. You could gain these by reading a book or even just by reading information such as this about them on the Internet. Please note though, that this only enabled me to decrease the length of time I spent irritated at the previous app, it gave me no help whatsoever for my pain (although perhaps if I had used it on a pain-specific negative emotion it would have worked for that). You may or may not be able to adapt a non-specific CBT diary to your pain issues - although irritation at medical professionals and treatments offered that completely fail to understand my situation is actually part of my pain problem and something I think most people with chronic pain are likely to face, so you can certainly try it for that.
According to Wikipedia, NICE recommends computerised CBT for mild to moderate depression, but doesn't recommend a specific product or anything specific to pain. You might be able to access this via your GP if your GP deems it suitable for chronic pain or you also have mild to moderate depression. I'm not clear if the NHS has any computerised or Internet-based CBT available that is suited to chronic pain and I was only able to find apps for smartphones available to the public and did not come across any other software you could buy (search size: lazy - I googled it and never got past the first page).

Does the individual practitioner matter? Yes. Studies of of psychotherapeutic treatment show that the top determinant of outcome is whether or not the patient likes the therapist, so find a therapist you like - even on the NHS you have the right to request a different therapist. Also, I find that some people's explanatory styles are likely to be a better match for the way you learn and understand than others. I find it really hard to get help from someone who I dislike or someone who explains things in a way that's meaningless to me. The same applies to books that are written in a manner that doesn't work for how I think and/or irritate me.

Is there any evidence for it? Reviews suggest CBT holds its own compared with usual care or no treatment at all for pain-related problems, with small to medium effects on pain intensity, catastrophising and mood, and small effects on pain-related disability and activity interference (not doing things because of pain). This conclusion and the reviews I looked at come from this paper by researchers at the University of Washington. The paper reviewed studies and reviews on the impact of CBT on chronic pain, but was not a systematic review so may be subject to bias and omission, but it does have a focus on statistical significance, which is something I approve of (statistically significant findings = reliable findings). I didn't look for any further trials. To be frank, when I present evidence, I am usually only presenting what I can find by trawling the Internet for 60 minutes or so, so this is no worse than that (proper systematic reviews take a lot of time and are usually done by professional researchers).

Here's my summary of what they found with links to the original reviews and meta-analyses:

CBT for chronic pain in general:
A 2012 Cochrane review  concluded that, compared with treatment-as-usual or wait-list control conditions (wait-list controls = people who do not get treatment until after the trial), CBT had statistically significant (i.e. we can trust these findings) but small effects on pain and disability, and moderate effects on mood and catastrophising, after treatment. By 6 to 12-month follow-up, however, the only significant effect was for mood. Compared with people getting other treatment, CBT was not superior for pain or mood outcomes.

CBT for chronic back pain:
A 2007 meta-analysis of 22 randomised controlled trials of psychological treatments for chronic back pain indicated that psychological interventions had positive effects on pain, pain-related interference with activities, health-related quality of life and depression compared to various other treatments or non-treatment. CBT was found to be better than not receiving treatment for improving the intensity of pain after treatment but not for health-related quality of life or depression. A 2010 Cochrane review of behavioural treatments (including CBT) for chronic low back pain, which included 30 randomised controlled trials, concluded that behavioural treatments were more effective than usual care for pain after treatment but no different in intermediate to long-term effects on pain or functional status (i.e. what you can and can't do). There was little or no difference between behavioural treatment and group exercise in improving pain and depressive symptoms over the intermediate to long term. However, for most of the comparisons there was only low or very low-quality evidence, and there was no high-quality evidence for any comparison (i.e. the evidence wasn't very reliable).

CBT for headaches:
A 2007 review of behavioural treatments for headaches described CBT-based interventions (relaxation, biofeedback and cognitive therapy) as reducing headache activity 30%–60% on average across studies. These effects surpassed those of other treatments/non-treatment and were typically sustained over time, including years after treatment.
According to this review, biofeedback interventions are commonly used in treating chronic headaches, either as a stand-alone treatment or in conjunction with other CBT techniques.

CBT for chronic oro-facial pain:
A 2011 Cochrane review of psychosocial interventions for chronic oro-facial pain concluded that CBT, either alone or with biofeedback, resulted in long-term (more than three months) improvements in pain intensity, depression, and pain-related activity interference; however, the authors called for more rigorous studies to substantiate these conclusions, saying that there was weak evidence to support the use of psychosocial interventions for chronic oro-facial pain and although significant effects were observed for outcome measures where pooling was possible, the studies were few in number and had high risk of bias.

CBT for rheumatoid arthritis:
A 2002 systematic review found that psychological interventions may be important adjunctive therapies in the medical management of rheumatoid arthritis, but that psychological interventions may be more effective for patients who have had the illness for shorter duration. A 2010 systematic review, noted that comparative analyses revealed that interventions utilising more self-regulation techniques reduced depressive symptoms and anxiety significantly more than interventions utilising fewer such techniques and also that depressive symptoms were reduced significantly more among recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patients than among those with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis.

CBT for fibromyalgia pain:
A 2010 analysis found cognitive-behavioural treatment to be significantly better than other psychological treatments in short-term pain reduction. Higher treatment dose was associated with better outcome. Publication-bias analyses demonstrated that the effect sizes were robust. The results suggested that the effects of psychological treatments for fibromyalgia were relatively small but robust and comparable to those reported for other pain and drug treatments used for this disorder. Cognitive-behavioural therapy was associated with the greatest effect sizes.

Are there any negatives? CBT takes time and effort (and if you have private sessions also a lot of money). Its effect is only likely to be small to moderate and it may not work for you at all. You may access it in a way that irritates you or isn't meaningful to you and you may have difficulty applying information from a book or keeping going with the exercises. I also dislike the impression I sometimes get from medical professionals that because CBT can be used for pain and may reduce disability levels, this implies that part of my level of disability is due to my attitude and that CBT can reverse disability or prevent further disability (this is far from proven) and that they want me to change my attitude through CBT instead of dealing directly with the disability or problem I currently have. This may actually be an example of mind-reading on my part, and CBT suggests I should test this assumption by checking with the medical professionals if this is really what they mean or if they are just out of ideas and CBT is the last weapon they have left in their arsenal and we're now down to things that only have a small impact on my mood instead of genuinely improving my pain or disability levels. Overall though, given that CBT ideas even help me investigate why I dislike people suggesting CBT to me so much, I'd say it's worth at least knowing what the thinking errors or cognitive distortions that CBT tries to deal with are, and if you think it is something that could be helpful to you, then pursuing it further, whether that's simply by reading a book or by other methods.

Anything else worth knowing? It's drug-free and may improve your mood and therefore your life in general. Also, if you like this method of trying to understand how your thinking and behaviour affect your well-being (or if you like the idea in theory, but dislike the way CBT is presented), you may also like to try reading the book Buddha's Brain.

Was it worth the money/effort? For me it is unlikely to be. According to WebMD my belief that it is unlikely to help me and will at best provide a small effect – probably on my already generally positive mood – means it's even less likely to work for me than for someone who believes it will work. I generally agree with the idea of avoiding the cognitive distortions CBT talks about, but actually I wasn't particularly prone to those in the first place, and suffer practically no anxiety and mainly already have a positive mood (admittedly with spots of temporary irritability), so the effects it's most likely to have (effects on mood) aren't in an area where I need much help. I also have a tendency to test out what I can and can't do and what the pain cost of doing those things is for me. It is possible it could have additional benefit for me and I have decided to give it a fair chance and complete the programme if the next clinic of pain education I'm booked in for offers it. I'm even thinking about buying and reading that book I found when researching this post. On the other hand, for me it definitely wouldn't be worth paying the over £1000 a private course of sessions could easily run to.

Have you tried CBT? Was it successful for you? Did you have to believe in it first to get the benefits? What benefits did you get? Were there any unexpected bonus benefits? Can you recommend a particular app or book? Or did it not suit you, and can you identify why that was?

Saturday, 14 May 2016

Osteopathy



What is it? Osteopathy is a system of treatment used primarily for musculoskeletal problems where the osteopath uses massage, manipulation, stretching and other phyical techniques. NB Osteopathy is not the same as American osteopathic medicine, despite the fact that providers of that are also sometimes referred to as "osteopaths" in America.

Does it work? It very much depends what the root of your problem is plus some other variables that seem not to have been identified yet (see the section on evidence). In particular, trials have looked at its efficacy for low back pain.
I couldn't make up my mind whether it worked for me. As a solution for my problems it at most lasted a few months and I sometimes got worse for a few days after treatment (even with exceedingly gentle treatment). This happens sometimes with osteopathy, and is not considered a problem (I agree with that, I think it's only a problem if you get worse for a few weeks or months or if you are consistently worse after it with no subsequent sign of improvement to beyond the state you were in to start with). I also often felt marvellous (for me) for an hour or so after treatment. My problem was that beyond the occasional marvellous hour, it wasn't clear whether I got better than I would have been without treatment or whether time would have healed me anyhow. For some people, it will hopefully be more obvious than it is for me.

Who does it work for? People with musculoskeletal problems, including postural problems. Trials have focused on people with low back pain. See above and the section on evidence.

Who doesn't it work for? There's no evidence that it works for anything that isn't a musculoskeletal problem. According to NHS Choices, some osteopaths claim to be able to treat things other than musculoskeletal problems, such as headaches, migraines, painful periods, digestive disorders and depression, but there isn't enough evidence to support this. If you have one of these and want to try an osteopath anyway, I recommend setting yourself a target before your first visit for the minimum you're hoping to achieve by when and at what cost for it to be worth the money. If it doesn't improve you to the minimum level you need, then stop. If the osteopath says you will need more treatment than you were hoping for it to work, work out what minimum result you would need to see for that to be worth it and if you don't achieve it, stop.

Where can I get it? Personal recommendation is always good. Alternatively, the Institute of Osteopathy has a website you can use to find one. Osteopaths are regulated by statute in the UK.

How much does it cost? According to the General Osteopathic Council, fees typically range from £35 to £50 for a 30 minute session. I have typically been recommended to have courses of weekly sessions - I think generally about 6-8 - followed by less frequent follow-up sessions to keep my body working right (e.g. every 6 weeks). I'm not sure how typical that is, but I have the suspicion that it is rare to be recommended only a single session. Your osteopath may want to see you for longer for your first visit when they assess your problems (and charge more for that session).

Is there a cheap/free version? In some areas you may be able to get osteopathic treatment on the NHS. If you have health insurance, that may cover it. Otherwise, as far as I'm aware, no, there's no cheap or free version.

Does the individual practitioner matter? I think so, as the osteopath's decisions on how to treat you will be based on their only personal knowledge and experience. As with most other jobs requiring a skill, it seems likely that some will be better than others, but I don't have any personal experience where I could say "osteopath A was definitely better than osteopath B".

Is there any evidence for it? Yes, but it's a bit mixed. Some trials show positive results, others show no improvment beyond the placebo effect. Also, some trials don't differentiate between osteopathy and other manipulation treatments, such as chiropractic and physiotherapy. I found the trials referenced in this section in this 2013 pdf from the National Council for Osteopathic Research.

No better than placebo:
A meta-analysis of 39 randomised controlled trials showed spinal manipulative therapy (which includes but is not limited to osteopathic manipulation) had no statistically or clinically significant advantage over general practitioner care, analgesics, physical therapy, exercises or back school. Results for patients with chronic low-back pain were similar. Radiation of pain, study quality, profession of manipulator, and use of manipulation alone or in combination with other therapies did not affect these results. Looking specifically at osteopathy, a randomised controlled trial of 91 participants and a 1985 controlled comparison of osteopathic manipulation with other treatment showed no clear benefit to osteopathy above placebo.

Better than placebo:
One small (40-patient) single-blind randomised controlled trial tested osteopathic manipulation against a control treatment known to work (chemonucleolysis) for patients with sciatica/symptomatic lumbar disc hermiation. Patients reported a 12-month outcome that was equivalent to chemonucleolysis, but showed a significant improvement compared to it in pain and disability in the first few weeks

A randomised trial known as UK BEAM looked at the impact of exercise, manipulation, and manipulation followed by exercise, each together with best GP care compared to GP care alone on chronic low back pain. After 3 months, they found an improvement with just exercise, a slightly greater improvement with manipulation and an even greater improvment still with manipulation and exercise. But "manipulation" here means a package of techniques representative of those used by the UK chiropractic, osteopathic, and physiotherapy professions, where the manipulation was applied by either a phyiotherapist, an osteopath or a chiropractor, so although this does speak in favour of osteopathy as one of the manipulation techniques involved, it doesn't differntiate it from physiotherapy or chiropractic. Also,  you couldn't tell in advance who was going to benefit.
This randomised controlled trial showed that an osteopathic manual treatment regimen met or exceeded the Cochrane Back Review Group criterion for a medium effect size in relieving chronic low back pain.
Are there any negative side effects? It's not cheap and you can have an adverse reaction to it. This study shows that headache, stiffness, discomfort and fatigue were quite common after manipulation (it didn't look at osteopathic manipulation specifically). However, it also noted that they were usually mild and short-lived. My own personal experience is that I sometimes feel worse immediately after or for a few days after osteopathy, but I've never felt worse for longer than that (and I have a particularly fragile body). Please note that I have always explained to osteopaths that I'm unusually fragile because of hypermobility syndrome and then they've left out any techniques they thought weren't gentle enough for me.

Anything else worth knowing? It's drug-free, which is great. My experience is that if your level of fitness (including in particular muscles) is poor, they will sometimes ask you to do exercises that you can do at home as part of your treatment.

Was it worth the money? I'm not sure if it was for me. I'm glad I tried it, but I'm not convinced it was a particularly good fit to my problems. The evidence suggests to me that it may create an improvement for some people, but not for everyone, and unfortunately you can't currently predict in advance if that will be you. I'd say that doesn't mean you shouldn't try it at all, but you need to think about what would represent a level of success worth the money to you.

Have you tried osteopathy? Was it successful for you? What signs did you recognise that by?

Saturday, 7 May 2016

Buddha's Brain by Rick Hanson


What is it? It's a book by Rick Hanson exploring the neuroscience behind the contemplative teachings of Buddhism and how you can harness it to rewire your own brain for greater well-being. Its subtitle is "the practical neuroscience of happiness, love and wisdom". It's not specifically aimed at people with chronic pain, but when I read it I found that a lot of the ideas in it applied well to pain. It may also help you better understand meditation and mindfulness (two things I found much harder to do before reading the book, although I have to confess I'm still no master now).

Does it work? It's another one that won't get rid of your pain, but it contains ideas you may be able to use to help you deal with and/or reduce its emotional and mental impact, such as the concept of the first and second dart.

Who does it work for? It can work for any kind of pain because it doesn't tackle pain itself, only the way you experience things (including pain). I reckon whether it will work for you depends on whether the way it's written speaks to you and explains it in a way that's meaningful to you. I like a scientific, evidence-based approach, so I like that about it. Because it's examining a religious tradition, it may also work for people who like a spiritual approach. My experience has been that some books work for me, some really don't, and this one did.
 
Who doesn't it work for? If your religion (or lack of religion) mean that you are uncomfortable learning the teachings of Buddhism (even though no belief in Buddhism is required or promoted), then this book probably isn't for you. Also, if you already apply all these teachings, then it might not have anything to add. Other than that, you're just running the risk that the way it's written won't be meaningful to you or explain things in a way that enables you to apply them.

How much does it cost? As at the time of writing, the prices on Amazon range from £4.99 from an audio download to £8.65 for a used paperback to £10.44 for a Kindle copy to £13.48 for a new paperback.

Is there a cheap or free version? You might be able to borrow a copy from a library. There's also an app available from iTunes for iPhone and iPad for £3.99. I haven't tried the app, but the principle sounds good.

Is there any evidence for it? I'm not aware of any trials looking at the impact of reading Buddha's Brain on chronic pain. Buddha's Brain itself presents evidence for pretty much everything it says and goes through how neuroscience says Buddhism's contemplative teachings have an effect.

Are there any downsides? You have to read the book and some of the suggestions aren't easy to apply and some take up quite a bit of time. But there are quite a wide range of suggestions and some of them are easier to apply than others, so hopefully you can find at least one that works for you.

Are there any other upsides? It's drug-free and has no side effects.

Was it worth the money and effort? I'm glad I bought it and I'm glad I have the information. It's improved my understanding of what's going on in my brain and also my understanding of things like mediation and mindfulness. Even though I still haven't cracked meditation and do slip back into bad habits, I have useful, practical information that I didn't have before I read it.

 
Have you read Buddha's Brain? Did it work for you? Have you tried the app? What do you think? Do you have any books that you can recommend?